Up, up and away: The first climber, designed to carry 20 tonnes of cargo. Eventually larger climbers would carry 200 tonnes.
Credit: Photolibrary
THREE DECADES AGO, fledgling scientists and teenage technophiles began losing themselves in a novel by the late great science fiction icon Arthur C. Clarke. When they finally put the book down, they were dazzled by a vision of ordinary people rising into space. Many of them still think longingly of Clarke's book when they peer at the stars.
The Fountains of Paradise is the story of a maverick 22nd-century engineer who proposes building a 'space elevator' that would ascend more than 32,000 km. The ground floor of this elevator would be at the top of an equatorial mountain in the mythical country of Taprobane. The engineer has to battle a host of sceptics as well as wage a philosophical war with the monks who own the mountain.
Funnily enough, the first person to develop a detailed plan for a space elevator hadn't read Clarke's book. Nine years ago, Brad Edwards, a physicist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, USA, was a little bored with the limitations of working at a huge government bureaucracy.
One day he read an article that declared it would be 300 years – if ever – before anyone had the materials or the capability to build a space elevator. Edwards had a bit of a track record for proving naysayers wrong, so this piqued his interest.
"My first thought was, 'Why can't it be built?'" says Edwards, now president of a Seattle, Washington, start-up company called Black Line Ascension, which conducts space elevator research and development. "I looked into it and threw out some of the concepts, like capturing an asteroid, that we don't have the technology to do. After that, I never found a good reason why it couldn't be done."
Edwards put together some calculations. Finally, he took a rough proposal for a space elevator to the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a division that encouraged people outside the U.S. space agency to explore bizarre yet scientifically sound concepts that might be useful decades in the future. In 1999 NIAC awarded Edwards a phase-one grant of US$75,000 (A$80,017) over six months.
Impressed with the paper from his phase-one study in 2000, NIAC then gave him a two year grant of US$500,000 to continue working on the project. Edwards quit his job and devoted himself to the space elevator full time. He polished off his phase-two term with a co-authored book, The Space Elevator: A Revolutionary Earth-to-Space Transportation System. It was a less poetic title than Clarke's, but it still caught the attention of the world's technology community.
Soon organisations such as the International Astronautical Congress and the American Society of Civil Engineers were holding sessions to discuss Edwards' plan. Space elevator conferences began attracting serious scientists.
The Spaceward Foundation was formed in 2004 to popularise the space elevator concept and accelerate research in its core technologies. A year later, a NASA program called Centennial Challenges offered large cash awards for the Space Elevator Games, in which competing teams build prototypes of space elevator components.
"The space elevator was viewed as science fiction until Brad's work," says Robert Cassanova, former director of NIAC, which closed due to budget cuts in 2007. "There are still lots of details to work out, but there are no major problems with the physics behind the idea. The physics tells us that if you can put this thing out there, it will work."
Space elevator.
You all need to turn your bulls*&t filters on. The space elevator is pie in the sky. The project is merely a means to separate the gullible investor from his or her cash.
allow for the possiblility...
I agree that this project sounds more than a little far-fetched as well as quite expensive. However, I think that the general tone of the world is leaning toward the negative especially when it comes to financial things. Who knows whether a project like this might not be a much needed infusion of jobs and cash?
Even if that weren't the case I don't see why something like this has to be considered only a money scam. It may have science fiction beginnings but that doesn't mean that it can't be possible. What began as fiction could become reality. If nothing else it is an exciting idea and a reason to hope for better things in the future instead of worrying about bad possibilities.
it is far fech but in the far fucher may be useful
as far as i am concerned it is not going to happen in my life time, such a creation could be useful if we were to populate the solar system, but that is not going to happen in the next 200 years.
I think its a good idea if we had better technolagy
Rockets need tons and tons of fuel to pack the amount of thrust needed to escape earths gravity, and so space elevators could be the solution to transporting heavy objects into space faster, more efficiently, and it could be a great means to get rid of nuclear waist. Nuclear energy is alot cleaner nowadays and we wouldn't have to barry our nuclear waist on earth, we could just boot it in space and that would be the end of it. There are many applications to the elevator, it would create thousands of jobs in the fields of science, and people who works need a place to live and so it would create thousands of jobs in the housing industry, and surrounding that would create thouasands more in business, law, medicine, it goes on and on. Every time new technolagies like the space elevetor come out it boosts the economy. Think about when the car first started being mass produced; it changed everything. Thats why we should keep pushing for abviously insane things like the space elevator.