COSMOS magazine


Share |


News

Stellar discovery ruins Aussie flag

Wednesday, 7 February 2007
Cosmos Online
Stellar discovery ruins Aussie flag

Three extra stars have been discovered orbiting members of the Southern Cross, which graces the flag of five nations. Beta Crucis, the boxed star on the left of the constellation, has two companions, and alpha Crucis, on the bottom, has one. The image at bottom left shows beta Crucis and its most recently-discovered companion.

Credit: Swarthmore College

SYDNEY: The discovery of three extra stars in the Southern Cross threatens the accuracy of the flags of five nations, including Australia.

Beta Crucis, the left hand star in the famous constellation, and the nineteenth brightest star in the sky, appears to have a companion that orbits it once every 2000 years, according to observations made by scientists using the U.S. Chandra X-ray Observatory satellite.

A team led by astronomer David Cohen of Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania uncovered the companion star largely by accident, while the group was using the satellite to study the X-rays emitted by Beta Crucis itself. "We were interested in how the highly supersonic stellar winds of hot, luminous stars produce X-rays," said Cohen. "We were surprised to see two strong X-ray sources where we had expected to see only one."

Nick Lomb, an astronomer at the Sydney Observatory, said the massive star's smaller companion had never been noticed because it was lost in the glare from Beta Crucis. "It would be like looking for a glow worm next to a floodlight," he told The Sydney Morning Herald.

Beta Crucis and its companion orbit each other at a distance of about 60 billion kilometres - 400 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun. But from our vantage point 352 light years away, the two stars are indistinguishable - the same apparent distance apart as a car's headlights seen from 100 kilometres away.

Beside Australia, the Southern Cross appears on the flags of New Zealand, Brazil, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Adding a sixth star to the Aussie flag to improve its accuracy would be difficult, though, Lomb told the Herald, because astronomers already know of two other ignored companions in the constellation.

Alpha Crucis, the star at the base of the cross, is a binary star system whose other member is invisible to the naked eye, and even before the Swarthmore team's discovery, scientists had identified another stellar companion to Beta Crucis, meaning that the system actually has three members. Beta Crucis' other companion completes an orbit once every five years - so close that the individual stars can only be resolved by noting the changes in their spectra.

According to Lomb, showing all eight stars to scale on the flag would require enlarging it slightly. "The flag would have to be huge, probably the size of Sydney," he told the Herald. He added that, in a few million years, the Cross would not exist, three of its stars having exhausted their fuel and burned out. Even sooner than that the perfect symmetry of the Cross will disappear "as all five stars are moving in very different, random directions. In 20,000 years the difference will be quite noticeable," he explained.

Michael Kuhn, an undergraduate member of Cohen's team, presented the findings at a recent meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Seattle, Washington state.

Follow COSMOSmagazine on TwitterJoin COSMOSmagazine on Facebook

Readers' comments

Southern Cross story

Why does a serious science magazine have to buy into the ridiculous suggestion that the discovery of a faint star in the Southern Cross "ruins the Aussie flag"? Within the boundaries of the constellation are the 5 bright'cross stars', many more naked eye stars if you happen to be away from the city and, take a look at the photo: there are thousnads and thousands of stars visible in a long exposure. In today's Sydney Morning Herald there was a similar sensationalist headline. I can (just) accept a daily rag, although the SMH should be above that, using senational headlines to attract attention; but Cosmos?

The discovery of a faint previously missed companion to a bright star is scientifically interesting. A threat to the national flag it is not.
Regards
Andrew Wood

About the comment

I agree partly with what has been said.

Yet, my opinion is that one should not take this news "à la lettre" (I am French). I mean that many people around the world learn that way why there are stars on the Australian flag and this is an opportunity to learn a new astronomy discovery in a quite fun way.

Fatalistically

We should all understand by now that getting the reader's attention these days has noting to do with facts. Any magazine today must also be a student of the "science" of advertising... not that I think it is right or proper, mind you :-)

Inaccurate flag?

Having the British flag in the corner is also inaccurate as Australia ceased being a colony of Britain many years ago. Nevertheless the Union Jack remains for historical reasons.

Australia is still part of

Australia is still part of the British commonwealth of nations and regards the British monarchy as Queen...hence the British Union Jack in the top left hand corner.

Inaccurate indeed! Bah! Humbug!

The State Flag of Hawaii also has the Union Jack in its corner, although Hawaii has been part of the US for quite a while. It is to do with history, and, like it or not, history happened.

Why did they have to

Why did they have to discover the stars ????? Now they have to create a new flag

GOOD!!!!!

GOOD!!!!!

Stellar discovery ruins Aussie flag

Makes no difference at all. The Australian flag is the peoples flag as it was selected and voted for by the people of this nation.
Accept it for what it is.

the people's flag?

From Wikipedia: "The flag of Australia was chosen in 1901 from entries in a worldwide design competition held following Federation. It was approved by Australian and British authorities over the next few years ... The current specifications were published in 1934, and in 1954 the flag became legally recognised as the 'Australian National Flag'."

So how is it "the people's flag"? There was no public vote, plebiscite or referendum - it was chosen by parliamentarians in the 1930s and 1950s. So really, it's "the politicians' flag".