COSMOS magazine


Share |


News

Vitamin pills do more harm than good

Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Vitamins don't help health

Although dietary supplements are commonly taken to prevent chronic disease, the long-term health consequences of many compounds are unknown. A new study suggests vitamin and mineral supplements offer little health benefit, and some could even increase the risk of death in older women.

Credit: iStockphoto

WASHINGTON: Dietary supplements in well-nourished people offer little health benefit and some could be linked to an increased risk of death in older women, a new study suggests.

Iron stood out among supplements as a particular concern, while calcium appeared to be linked to lower death risk, said the study in the Archives of Internal Medicine, a journal of the American Medical Association.

With a large market for vitamin and mineral supplements, the study aimed to examine whether they had any effect on extending lifespan in an already well-nourished population.

The researchers confirmed their theory - that supplements were not helping people ward off death, and in fact, could have long-term safety implications.

"Based on existing evidence, we see little justification for the general and widespread use of dietary supplements," wrote the study authors from the University of Eastern Finland and the University of Minnesota.

"We found that several commonly used dietary vitamin and mineral supplements, including multivitamins, vitamins B6, and folic acid, as well as minerals iron, magnesium, zinc, and copper, were associated with a higher risk of total mortality."

Supplement users face higher death risk

The U.S. and Finnish researchers examined data from the Iowa Women's Health Study, including surveys filled out by 38,772 women with an average age of 62.

Women self-reported their supplement use in 1986, 1997 and 2004, and data showed their use rose from 66% of survey-takers at the start to 85% by 2004.

Those who took supplements showed a range of healthy lifestyle factors, and were more likely than non-supplement users to be non-smokers, eat low-fat diets and exercise.

But in many cases they showed a higher risk of dying than their supplement-free counterparts. "Of particular concern, supplemental iron was strongly and dose dependently associated with increased total mortality risk," said the study.

Still, the exact reasons for the link to higher risk of overall mortality, or the risk of dying for any reason, were less clear.

The calcium exception

On the other hand, "supplemental calcium was consistently inversely related to total mortality rate," meaning that calcium-takers showed a lower death risk, though the same dosage relationship was not visible.

The authors said they could not rule out the possibility that the reason for the higher death rate in iron users could have been due to underlying conditions for which they were taking supplements, and more research is needed.

In the meantime, doctors urged patients to consider the risks of taking supplements unless they are needed to stave off deficiencies.

"We think the paradigm 'the more the better' is wrong," wrote doctors Goran Bjelakovic of the University of Nis in Serbia and Christian Gluud of Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark in an accompanying commentary.

Not recommended as a preventative measure

These findings "add to the growing evidence demonstrating that certain antioxidant supplements, such as vitamin E, vitamin A, and beta-carotene, can be harmful," they said.

"We cannot recommend the use of vitamin and mineral supplements as a preventive measure, at least not in a well-nourished population."

Bjelakovic and Gluud said the only supplement that may be beneficial to older women, and possibly older men, is vitamin D3, if they do not already get enough through their diet or from sun exposure.

"The issue of whether to use calcium supplements may require further study," they added.

Follow COSMOSmagazine on TwitterJoin COSMOSmagazine on Facebook

Readers' comments

this stinks of propaganda

I'm surprised nonsense like this is posted on this website. codex alimentarius propaganda much?

Vitamin pills do more harm than good? Not really.

Another example of junk science. The study had no controls, did not account for variances in the quantity and quality of vitamins consumed, did not account for a myriad of other potentially confounding factors, and is at odds with an enormous amount of prior study demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of numerous vitamin supplements.

(For some tips on evaluating the claims made by "experts," please see http://engineeringthinking.wordpress.com/)

Vitamin Pills Do More Harm Than Good

This is the basis for the article???
"But in many cases they showed a higher risk of dying than their supplement-free counterparts."
Please define "many cases", versus the headline inference of "all".
For-shame on the Author!

Adverse reports on vitamins

It seems no account is taken of the aging body not being as adept at converting food and its vitamins so readily therefore leading to the necessity of supplemental aid.

I notice up in the corner an add to an article aspirin could beat cancer.
Not so long ago the same medication was considered detrimental to bowel and stomach health. Coffee was bad for you, it is now brain beneficial.
The list is endless. Guess it matters, very often, who fosters and finances the research.

Tom Edgar... Glen Aplin Q