The international prototype of the kilogram is inside three nested bell jars at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures in Paris. Scientists have discovered that it has mysteriously lost a tiny, but significant, amount of weight.
LONDON: Scientists in France are moving closer to coming up with a non-physical definition of the kilo after discovering the metal artefact used as the international standard had shed a little weight.
Researchers caution there is still some way to go before their mission is complete, but if successful it would lead to the end of the useful life of the last manufactured object on which fundamental units of measure depend.
At the moment, the international standard for the kilo - the equivalent of around 2.2 pounds - is a chunk of metal, under triple lock-and-key in France since 1889.
Small weight loss has huge implications
But scientists became concerned about the cylinder of platinum and iridium housed at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sevres, near Paris, after discovering it had mysteriously lost a tiny amount of weight.
Experts at the institute revealed in 2007 that the metal chunk is 50 micrograms - 0.0000017 ounces - lighter than the average of several dozen copies, meaning it had lost the equivalent of a small grain of sand.
They are now searching for a non-physical way of defining the kilo, which would bring it in line with the six other base units that make up the International System of Units (SI). The other units are the metre, the second, the ampere, the kelvin, the mole and the candela, and none of them are now based on a physical reference object.
Doing away with the international prototyp
Experiments are focused on establishing a link between mass and the Planck constant, the fundamental unit of measurement in quantum physics, to provide a new definition of the kilo.
Michael Stock, a BIPM scientist who will discuss the proposed change in London, said the metal chunk, known as the ‘international prototype’, was coming to the end of its useful life.
"Measurements get more and more precise, and precise measurements require well-defined measurement units to express their results," he said. "Our experiments are moving forward, however, it is too early to implement the new definition of the kilogram just yet," he added.
Where is the interesting part?
I was eager to learn how and why a chunk of metal can lose weight. Some science to explain this would have been interesting to see in this science magazine. For the benefit of others I did a quick search and here are brief through still unsatisfactory conjectures:
"The real crux of this problem is that it's impossible to tell what has changed over the past 120 years. The copies may have grown heavier over time by absorbing air molecules. But it's equally possible that the kilogram is getting lighter. Periodic washings, for example, may have removed microscopic quantities of metal from its surface.
Or it could be that both the copies and the kilogram are changing, but at different rates. There is no way to tell what's happening because mass is always calibrated against another mass."
Kilo gets lighter.
If the mass is calibrated as a weight, then a subtle shift of the earth's molten mantle and outer core might account for enough gravitational variance to explain the 50 microgram change.
decay ?
decay ?
A lighter kilogram
Oh no! This means I'm putting on weight even while I'm dieting and exercising!