COSMOS magazine


Share |


News

Meteorite contains complex organic molecules

Tuesday, 16 February 2010
Cosmos Online

Single page print view

Murchison meteorite

The Murchison meteorite contains complex organic molecules – including carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur.

Credit: Wikimedia

SYDNEY: Previously unknown organic molecules have been discovered in a 100 kg meteorite that hit Australia in 1969, suggesting that our early Solar System contained a soup of highly complex organic chemistry long before life appeared.

In a recent study scientists analysed the Murchison meteorite, which landed in Murchison near Melbourne, Australia, in 1969.

The meteor is thought to have originated in the early days of our Solar System, perhaps even before the Sun formed around four and a half billion years ago.

Previous studies emphasised simple molecules

Murchison is one of the most studied meteorites, already recognised for the diversity of its organic chemistry – the chemistry of compounds containing carbon.

While 70% of the carbon content in the meteorite has been classified as insoluble, previous studies have identified more than 500 organic chemical structures in the soluble fraction, resembling known biomolecules.

However, analyses of the solvent extracts up until now have all been targeted to selected classes of compounds with an emphasis on amino acids as a potential source of life on Earth, according to the study published in the U.S. journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Large chemical diversity

Now, for the first time, scientists have used advanced ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry to conduct a non-targeted experiment.

In previous studies, the average formula was C100H70O12N3S2, with a high degree of aromaticity in the associated compounds. In this study, researchers found an average formula of C100H155O20N3S3, showing a higher oxygen content and higher aliphaticity (hydrogen-rich compounds not containing aromatic rings).

In old studies and in this new study, only a small number of molecules contained phosphorous, the other of the six major elements involved in life.

The researchers found 14,197 distinct elemental formulas. Taking into account the limitation of the instrument used, the researchers estimate that there may actually be more than 50,000.

Each elemental formula can have a number of different physical structures, called isomers. The molecules that the researchers discovered are large, and contain a high proportion of atoms other than carbon and hydrogen, which makes the number of possible isomers huge. The researchers estimate a “realistic minimum of several thousand isomers for any given elemental composition”.

In total, they estimate that “several millions of different chemical compounds might be present … as a result of abiotic chemistry.”


Readers' comments

What kind of science is this?

This is one of the most poorly-written articles I've ever ready purporting to be about science.

"Now, for the first time, scientists have used advanced analytical methods to conduct a non-targeted experiment." For God's sake, that's either meaningless or you're being deliberately obtuse.

"They discovered highly complex combinations of organic molecules including hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur." Leading us to believe you have no idea what molecules are. It's certainly none of the things you've listed.

I could go on but the stupid makes my brain hurt.

agreed.

please stop outsourcing science article summaries to bangladesh.

Motion seconded.

Motion seconded.

"They discovered highly

"They discovered highly complex combinations of organic molecules including hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur." Leading us to believe you have no idea what molecules are. It's certainly none of the things you've listed.

What's so odd about organic molecules which contain hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur? Looks pretty normal to me.

Or are you a Young Earth troll?

Elements vs. molecules

The article said "including", not "containing".

Saying "... highly complex combinations of organic molecules containing hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur" would have been technically correct, but there's nothing remarkable about those elements.

Providing examples of the actual organic molecules found would be far more interesting and useful.

very very good science

Read the foregoing paragraph and it will become clear what the author means by a non-targeted experiment: before this study people only looked for specific compounds which are important for the development of early life forms. This one can detect more chemicals and is thus "non-targeted."

With regard to your second comment: Use that big brain of yours to give the author a break--she clearly knows what a molecule is.

Whats the world coming to...

Just wanted to throw out a definition from dictionary.com, pretty much proves that you need to learn some more English. Maybe next time they can add some pretty pictures so you can understand whats going on.

Include:
1. to contain, as a whole does parts or any part or element: The package includes the computer, program, disks, and a manual.

Who really says an article is bad because it says including? You must have way to much free time...

this is comical

This article is actually funny.

very funny

comments are worth more than this article.

Open and enquiring minded Readership

It's a little disturbing to realise that elements of the readership of this excellent magazine are somewhat less open and enquiring minded and science-literate than one would think. Perhaps it's the big words.
This article contains some new and intriguing material, and not just for for organic chemists. PS: The earth isn't really flat.