Mystery solved?: The asteroid belt is a ring of rocky debris between Jupiter and Mars, thought to have been created when Jupiter's mass made the area too unstable for planet formation.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltch/T.Pyle
BRISBANE: Mysterious gaps in the asteroid belt may have been caused by a shift in the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn four billion years ago, researchers say.
A computer simulation of the gravitational influence of these migrating planets matches previously unexplained gaps in the belt, according to a report published in the British journal Nature today.
"The pattern in the missing asteroids confirms other lines of evidence that the giant planets went through a brief episode of migration some time in the Solar System's early history," said David Minton study co-author and astronomer at the University of Arizona in Tucson, USA.
Ring of rocky debris
The asteroid belt is a ring of rocky debris between Jupiter and Mars, thought to have been created when Jupiter's mass made the area too unstable for planet formation. The debris is not evenly distributed, and the belt has zones where there are far fewer asteroids than expected, said Minton.
Some of those gaps, called Kirkwood gaps, are in zones where Jupiter or Saturn's gravitational influence destabilises the asteroids so much that they are ejected from the belt, but many are in areas that are currently stable.
Minton and University of Arizona colleague Renu Malhotra suspected that the answer lay in the migration of the giant planets, which are thought to have formed elsewhere in the Solar System and moved to their present location around four billion years ago.
Jupiter is thought to have formed slightly further away from the Sun than it is today, and Saturn, Uranus and Neptune were once closer, Minton said.
The planets were subsequently dragged into their present positions by the gravity of large objects ejected from the Kuiper belt, a ring of icy debris lying beyond the planets. Once the Kuiper belt was depleted of large objects, the planets settled into their current orbits.
Bombardment of the planets
The researchers designed a computer simulation that described the changing gravitational influence of the planets on the asteroid belt, and found that many of the unexplained gaps matched areas that would have been destabilised by Saturn or Jupiter's gravity during the planetary relocation.
The destabilised asteroids would have been ejected from the belt, and many would have become projectiles that bombarded Earth and the other inner planets. "The effects of all those impacting asteroids would have been quite dramatic and violent," said Minton.
Paul Francis, an astronomer at the Australian National University's Mt Stromlo Observatory, near Canberra, said that astronomers used to think that planets stayed where they had formed, until the first planets were discovered near other stars.
Several of these planets were too close to their stars to have formed there, leading to the theory of planetary migration, Francis said. "[This study] is giving us the hard evidence that migration also happened in our own Solar System," he said.

meteors seeds of planets
meteroids are seeds of planets only out of very few can germinate in big planets.
jsispat@gmail.com
true
that's true
not true
scientists never thought this stuff
Sorry for thr re-post, but it holds the same.
This article gives even more fuel to what i stated below.
...
If we all agree that the solar system formed just as we were taught; then how is it even possible for there to be an asteroid belt?
During planet formation swirling clouds absorbed all matter surrounding it and became a planet. The size of the planet depended on how much matter it absorbed.
So why was the asteroid belt not absorbed?
...
We all agree that at one point the Earth was warmer than it is now and had massive plant and animal growth, far larger then than now. Dinosaurs, giant reptiles would have needed to have far warmer climates to grow and survive as well as the abundance of then tropical plants world wide.
We all agree that at one time Mars had water. We can look at the terrain and determine that rivers flowed on the surface.
...
We all agree that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Everyone knows how gravity works and how it affects the pull on planets.
...
We all agree there was a period where asteroids pummeled all the planets / rock planets that we can visibly see at any rate. The Earth, Mars, Mercury, and our moons.
...
Do the math. Place another planet between Mars and Jupiter and it would shift the planets in both directions as it would take up the space and displace the planets around it.
This would cause Earth and Mars to be closer to the Sun. That would explain the warmer temperature and the growth of reptiles as well as Mars having flowing water.
...
Now break that planet up and the opposite would occur. The planets would roll back and forth until they settled into a solid orbit again. Hence the mass extinction and ice age as well as Mars cooling. Global movement means plate shifts, ocean movement and rapid freezing all very sudden. It explains the impact craters on all the other rock planets and moons. It also explains why there is an asteroid belt floating between planets that should have been absorbed when they formed.
...
How or why the planet came apart? I have no clue, but everything else is easy to see. The assumption that somehow a stream of asteroids barreled along thru the solar system and just came into orbit is farfetched at best. If indeed a stream of object would have come through they would have been sucked into Jupiter’s gravitation pull, but the idea that they somehow snaked their way through all the other planets and just took up their current orbit? The explanation I give simply makes far more sense and explains how and why the other events came to be.
...
LL