COSMOS magazine

Get COSMOS Teacher's Notes

News

Meteorites laid groundwork for early life

Monday, 8 December 2008
Cosmos Online

Single page print view

Asteroid impact

Credit: NASA

BRISBANE: Life on Earth may have been kick-started when meteorites crashed into the oceans, generating a soup of organic molecules from inorganic precursors, a new study has found.

The research, reported this week in the journal Nature Geoscience, suggests a new route for how organic molecules like amino acids may have first formed on Earth.

Experts believe a soup of these molecules may have brewed up Earth's earliest life-forms.

Prebiotic molecules

"Our study presents experimental evidences about a new source of prebiotic biomolecules," the study's lead author Yoshihiro Furukawa, of Tohoku University in Sendai, Japan, told Cosmos Online.

There are many ideas about how organic molecules could have been synthesised from inorganic molecules, such as by lightning strikes or in deep sea volcanic vents. However, there is little experimental evidence that any of these methods worked under conditions that were likely to have been present on the early Earth.

To get around that problem, some experts have suggested that organic biomolecules were synthesised elsewhere in the universe and delivered to Earth on meteorites. But Furukawa's team now believe that meteorite impacts could have actually synthesised the molecules themselves.

To make the finding, his team fired meteorite-like balls of iron and carbon into a mixture of water and ammonia, meant to resemble the oceans billions of years ago. In the experiment, the researchers found that the iron and carbon were heated by the impact and reacted with hydrogen and nitrogen to form biomolecules, including fatty acids, amines and the amino acid glycine.

Prebiotic molecules

To make sure that the organic molecules weren't contaminants, the team used a rare isotope of carbon (carbon 13) in their imitation meteorites – and it was this isotope that was found in the resulting soup, proving that it came from the 'meteorite' source.

Meteorite impacts were common on the early Earth, Furukawa said, so it's possible that simple organic molecules concentrated in the oceans and were synthesised into even more complex molecules by subsequent impacts.

However, the researchers are not sure whether the amount of molecules produced could have been enough to have had a role in the genesis of life. "Further experiments are needed for accurate estimations," said Furukawa.

Readers' comments

and...

cue the Fundamentalists Christians in 3,2,1...

Surprisingly

The Christians haven't come out in droves yet. I'm sure it will happen soon enough, though. It's sad that they can't take alternate views than their own without thoroughly bashing them.

They sure have

The problem of fundamental Christians is larger than you realise. I would watch the documentary 'Jesus Camp' and then be scared, very scared. (Why do Christian’s actively deny Global warming? it makes no sense)

It is a matter of Science and not religion

The author of the article confuses science and religion when he writes "But Furukawa's team now believe that meteorite impacts could have actually synthesised the molecules themselves." That is bad reporting. Scientific opinion does not consist of belief but rests on statements of hypothesis and theory that are testable and therefore open to falsfication. Some forms of religion (especially fundamentalism) rest on belief. When reporting scientific discoveries or opinion, please us the language of science and not religion. Science neither rests on belief nor proof but advances through a process of conjecture and falsification. Read Karl Popper. By the way, I a trained both in science and in theology.

not bad reporting at all

I have "known" impacts started life on earth for several years...that and much, much more. But, if you don't have a pedigree, no one listens. I've tried, for three years to get the "experts" to listen...not just for scientific, but monetary reasons and...not one response. So, let the reporter report to the best of his/her ability, if for no other reason, to allow those who have trained in science and theology to understand that........they DON'T know EVERYTHING. (Oh, and, let's all start Christian bashing so we're ready for the "end time". ...And, no I'm not.)

not bad reporting at all

I have "known" impacts started life on earth for several years...that and much, much more. But, if you don't have a pedigree, no one listens. I've tried, for three years to get the "experts" to listen...not just for scientific, but monetary reasons and...not one response. So, let the reporter report to the best of his/her ability, if for no other reason, to allow those who have trained in science and theology to understand that........they DON'T know EVERYTHING. (Oh, and, let's all start Christian bashing so we're ready for the "end time". ...And, no I'm not.)

For someone who "knows" so much.

You sure do suck at replying.