COSMOS magazine

Get COSMOS Teacher's Notes
  • Add this story to stumbleupon
  • Add this story to Yahoo Buzz
  • Add this story to Digg
  • Add this story to reddit
  • Add this story to Slashdot
  • Add this story to newsvine
  • Add this story to facebook
  • Add this story to technorati
  • Add this story to del-icio-us
  • Add this story to furl

News

'Dinosaur eel' points to future body armour

Monday, 28 July 2008
Agence France-Presse
Dinosaur eel

Heavily armoured: A Senegal birchir in an aquarium.

Credit: MIT

PARIS: An extraordinary African fish that inhabits muddy pools, and whose lineage can be traced back 96 million years, could be the model for the light, bomb-proof body armour of the future.

So say Pentagon-backed scientists who have pored over the scales of Polypterus senegalus, also called the Senegal bichir or the dinosaur eel.

Long and skinny and of ancient heritage, the 40-centimetre-long predator has multiple layers of scales that first dissipate the energy of a strike, then protect against any penetration to the soft tissues below and finally limit any damage to the shield to the immediate area surrounding the assault.

Experts at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), in Boston, U.S., used nano-scale measurements to look at several scales that were harmlessly removed from a living fish. They found the scales – about 500 millionths of a metre thick – have four layers. The tiny shield was then put to the test, in a simulation of a biting attack.

"Energy-dissipating mechanisms"

The team believe the scales' protection is remarkably effective because of the different composite materials, the geometry and thickness of each of these layers. The overlapping junctions between the layers themselves also play an important role.

The design is "fascinating, complex and multiscale," say the scientists who detail the discovery in the British journal Nature Materials.

"Such fundamental knowledge holds great potential for the development of improved biologically-inspired structural materials," said Christine Ortiz, an MIT associate professor in materials science and engineering and lead author of the study.

"Many of the design principles we describe – durable interfaces and energy-dissipating mechanisms, for instance – may be translatable to human armour systems," said Ortiz.

Readers' comments

And people still believe

And people still believe that such a marvellously ingenius system happened to evolve by chance....

Groan

"Chance" has nothing to do with it, evolution is a finely honed mechanism in the living world. A mechanism that shapes living things over MILLIONS of years, not a week. And to think that some people believe that a mythical super being in the sky went POOF and created it out of nothing.

...in primitive superstitions

I don't think anyone believes such a system evolved by chance. Educated people realize it evolved by natural selection, whereas the superstitious believe it was created by their imaginary friend in the sky.

and you seem to think that

and you seem to think that the universe is a man in the sky..
watch who you call primitive, sonny.

re: and you seem to think that

I think you are confused. I did not call you primitive. It was your superstitious belief in "creation theory" I called primitive.
- Best, Sonny

armout

If you will google Dragon Skin Body Armour you will see that this concept has been used for years. Old news, been there, done that.

Creationists and theists are so depressing

The idea of a cosmic designer tweaking designs for eel armor is frankly bizarre. It raises more question than it answers. How does the designing take place? How does the cosmic designer actually change the creature's DNA? Why would such a designer bother? Out of love of eels?
The answer in all cases is that a designer is an intellectual cop-out for people who want to engage in a kind of mystic ignorance of the wonders of the universe instead of actually understanding the wholly physical and natural processes that drive life and evolution. That is why people hate Darwin and evolution so much: because it pushes back and reduces the role of God (or Gods) in the universe, particularly in the all-important area of life and creation.
This is not believing in a flat earth. In fact, few people believed the earth was flat. They could see the masts of ships dipping below the horizon. What people couldn't conceive was that gravity could keep people sticking to all sides of the globe. Gravity was the unifying scientific principle that helped explain a spherical earth (rather than, say, an earth which is on the backs of elephants standing on a giant turtle).
Eels that grew better armor survived and reproduced better than eels that had worse armor.

atheists: "missing the forest for the trees since 5000b.c."

who said anything about a designer?
the universe is what some call god, if god/existence/the universe is real, why bother arguing?
of course the universe is physical, THATS THE POINT.

darwin doesn't push back god, he merely shows that natural selection is viable, and as we see with viruses and insects, provable.

as I understand creationism, it is saying "evolution is real - and, thanks to natural selection choosing this eel and not that one.. and the dimension of time, is as it should be. the flying eel doesn't exist so far so was never going to exist.. so far"
however I have for a long time searched for facts, rejecting religion, then seeing a concept that has been, as far as I can tell, not been widely discussed in a while.
yes, random.
no, not pointless.

its more perceptual reality and metaphysics than evolution, God [or time and space, if yer a sissy] is a concept that is beyond our control.

a "designer" suggests something as silly and arbitrary as sentience or humanism - the time/space continuum is more than that.

everything is everything, whatever will be will be, I am that I am, a is a, the big bang and everything in it down to a subproton level is GOD.
the very concept of god seems to go way over most people's heads, on both sides of the fence.

What about the Flying

What about the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Pantheism

atheist haven't missed the point you're simply discribing pantheism. the point is most creationist don't think of "god" in that way, they believe he is a supernatural "intelligent" being who involes himself in our daliy lives and makes "choices" to punish them or whatnot. While new earth creationists believe he created the world in 6000 years. Pantheists and atheist aren't really differn't one label Nature as "God" the other labels nature as nature, but once you suggest that life as we know today wasn't a natural phenomenon but rather a "god" who chose to create this animal and reject another then that enters the realm of the supernatural and quite frankly ridiculous.