Energy efficient light sources like this compact fluorescent bulb look set to replace the incandescent bulb Down Under, after the Australian Government announced today that the conventional bulbs will be phased out by 2010.
Credit: Wikipedia
SYDNEY: The venerable but rampantly inefficient conventional incandescent light bulb is set to be phased out in Australia by 2010.
The move is expected to reduce Australia's carbon emissions by roughly four million tonnes per year by 2015, when all incandescent bulbs will have been replaced with more energy-efficient options.
"The most effective and immediate way we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions is by using energy more efficiently," said Australian Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull, announcing the new policy earlier today. "Electric lighting is a vital part of our lives … but it is still very inefficient. We have been using incandescent light bulbs for 125 years and up to 90 per cent of the energy each light bulb uses is wasted, mainly as heat."
Emissions can be reduced, said Turnbull, by switching to alternatives like compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs), which use about 80 per cent less energy than conventional incandescent bulbs.
According to the ministry, energy for lighting represents about 12 per cent of greenhouse emissions from households, and 25 per cent from the commercial sector.
Nationwide energy provider EnergyAustralia reports on their website that swapping one conventional bulb for a compact fluorescent can prune up to A$10 from your electricity bill every year.
Traditional incandescent bulbs generate light by forcing electric current along a very thin wire called a filament, usually made of tungsten. The flowing current heats the filament so much that it glows brightly - producing light as a by-product of heat.
In the far more efficient and long-lasting fluorescent bulbs, a small amount of mercury vapour is contained inside a glass tube. Electric discharges inside the tube cause the mercury to emit ultraviolet light, which is invisible to humans. A fluorescent coating on the inside of the tube (which gives fluorescent lights their familiar opaque white colour) absorbs the photons and re-emits them as visible light.
Charlie Stevens, a spokesperson for WWF Australia, notes that, while "energy-efficient bulbs are more expensive than the 60-cent bulbs from the supermarket," consumers will make their money back quickly in electricity bill savings.
WWF has congratulated the new policy, but cautioned that it is not a cure for global warming. "We think it's a great idea. This is a useful first step in transforming to an energy efficient world," said Stevens, "but it is a small first step … a lot of work still needs to be done."
In 2004, Australia emitted about 564 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. The reduction of four million tonnes expected from full replacement of incandescent bulbs with CFLs is equivalent to 1 per cent of the total. Stevens, suggesting that a suitable goal for tackling global warming would be a massive 60 per cent reduction in emissions from current levels by 2050, said that the new policy "was nowhere near enough."
The new move will not affect halogen bulbs like those found in automobile headlamps and track lighting in homes. While halogens work on a similar principle as incandescents, halogen bulbs last longer and are more efficient than their conventional cousins.
Australia is not the first government to propose switching off incandescents; last month, the U.S. state of California proposed a bill that would phase out incandescent light bulbs by 2012 in favour of CFLs.


withdrawing incandescent light bulbs
Is there cause for concern over the mercury content of fluorescent lights? Incandescents at least seem to be harmless in landfill. Anything to worry about in the phosphors? We're already disposing of millions of tubes per year and I've never noticed anybody having spoken up about this, though I did once see a fluorescent tube claiming reduced mercury at a hardware store. Perhaps the mercury quantity is too small to worry about?
Lighting - Flourescent
I don't think we want any amount of mercury seeping into the eco system if possible. Does anyone find flourescent lighting unpleasant, even with lamp shades? Why is this, and what can be done? What about LED lighting?
Lighting - Flourescent
I also find Fluorescent lighting not as good for my eyes as the equivalent wattages as stated on the packets. This is improved somewhat by being careful just which fluorescent lamps you purchase for use. The colour temp. is given in degrees Kelvin and about 5000 degrees K seems to be a good light for reading. Lower temp. values give more interesting colour for feelings of warmth etc. These are not coloured lamps as such and look much the same when not switched on, but the light emmitted is vastly different and should be experimented with, before rejecting Fluorescent lamps. With special lamps etc you can even dim the light output. Light intensities range from warm white which is a definite pink to brilliant daylight
Regards to all and good luck with your lighting
Bill Pilgrim
240 volts ??????
If an incadescent GLS light globe takes 240v to power up & a 15w CFL takes 240v to power up..... if the CFL is SO efficient.... how many power stations can be closed down & how many miners can we put out of work & how many mines can we close because the coal wont be required to power the power stations ????
Voltage does not matter
The voltage does NOT make any difference in power consumption. a 50W, 240V incandescent/halogen or a 12V 50W halogen uses about 5 times more electricity than equivalent an 11W 240V CFL. Electricity is transmitted at 240V default. By avoiding a transformer (like in low voltage DLs) you are not providing another avenue for energy loss.
Please revise your high school science/physics before making such comments.
I don't see them closing any coal stations but it reduces the need for us to build more polluting power stations in the future. It helps us stabilize our emissions as we eventually switch to cleaner sources of energy be it clean-coal tech with carbon geo-sequestration etc or renewable sources.
If indeed you are so concerned about such issues, switch green energy.
Recycling
I am excited about this new movement to improve the environment and reduce energy. I use compact fluorescent light bulbs and can attest to the fact that they do save energy.
I was seeking a recycling solution recently and found one at 1000bulbs.com.
Here is a link:
Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs Recycler
I can see this working for someone who uses about 1000 light bulbs a year, but what about us who don't?
There will have to definitely be a recycling solution in place well before the launch of this or it is a self defeating endeavor. You will save energy, but you will create new environmental issues by poisoning the landfills with toxic mercury.
Recycling
compact Flurescent light bulb recycling in Australia
you may want to check out this Australian company
http://www.advancedrecycling.com.au/
Recycling Solution at IKEA?
I've read that IKEA currently recycles these bulbs - perhaps, at a location near you?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55213
Looking forward to the LED revolution!
Fluorescent bulbs
Check out this article about the poor choice fluorescent is. http://www.ucalgary.ca/news/uofcpublications/oncampus/weekly/oct27-06/bulb-eater/
I live in Canada where for about 8 months of the year, some heat during the dark hours is welcome - reading a book close to a 60 watt bulb helps ward off a chill. So as for the energy savings, I believe a complete accounting has not been done. Most of that "waste" heat helps to warm the house.
I have tried replacing incadescent light withthe recommended fluorescent and the brightness is about 30% less, ie about 35% more energy is needed in the fluorescent to match the incadescent - reducing the savings again.
I am unaware of proper disposal sites for fluorsecent bulbs and suspect most users are unaware of the mercury issue. I recommend you push for a cleaner, less polluting and more energy efficient solution as undertaken by the University of Calgary.
Alan Gibb
Hudson, Quebec
LEDS not fluoros
(I tried to post a comment here on this subject yesterday, but it never made it, I think. Here's the gist again.)
Light emitting diodes look to be cheaper, brighter and safer than fluoros. Not sure if they can be dimmed, but fluoros can't. Which makes it tricky in the bedroom or the baby's room when all the incandescent bulbs are made illegal.