COSMOS magazine

Get COSMOS Teacher's Notes
  • Add this story to stumbleupon
  • Add this story to Yahoo Buzz
  • Add this story to Digg
  • Add this story to reddit
  • Add this story to Slashdot
  • Add this story to newsvine
  • Add this story to facebook
  • Add this story to technorati
  • Add this story to del-icio-us
  • Add this story to furl

News

U.S. wolf hunt to resume

Wednesday, 31 January 2007
Agençe France-Presse
U.S. wolf hunt to resume

The grey wolf will be removed from the endangered species list in at least three U.S. states, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Credit: Wikimedia

SALMON, Idaho: Legal wolf hunting will is set to resume in the U.S. for the first time in decades, after wildife authorities announced plans to remove the wolf from the endangered species list in at least three states.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director H. Dale Hall said the decision was taken because the wolves had been successfully re-populated. "We're extremely proud to be announcing the recovery of the wolf," he said.

Hall and other officials said removing federal protections for the 4,000 wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and proposing to lift them for the 1,200 wolves in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming is proof that the Endangered Species Act, the nation's landmark conservation law, works.

Under both plans, states would have the authority to manage their wolf populations as they see fit so long as they maintain enough wolves to ensure their survival.

Wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin will be de-listed in a matter of weeks, while it will take a year to complete the public hearings and other requirements to remove wolves from the list in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.

Conservation groups hailed the plan for wolves in the Great Lakes region, applauding Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for what they said were wolf-management plans that will ensure the survival of the species. But they heaped criticism on plans by Idaho and Wyoming.

"Idaho and Wyoming have state management plans that are geared toward wolf eradication, not wolf conservation," said U.S. non-profit Defenders of Wildlife president Rodger Schlickeisen in a statement.

Wolves in the United States were hunted to near-extinction a century ago under government-sponsored elimination programs designed to protect livestock. By 1974, when wolves were classified as endangered, the only documented wolf packs in the lower 48 states were in Minnesota and Michigan.

In 1995, federal wildlife biologists released 66 wolves into the wilds of central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in the hope they would re-establish themselves in their native range. But the wolf's restoration in the western regions has been greeted with outrage by ranchers and hunters, who make up the region's most powerful lobbies.

They contend wolves are a nuisance, threatening livestock and causing declines in big-game populations. They have campaigned tirelessly to persuade state political leaders and federal officials that their numbers should be cut dramatically.

If the proposals to de-list wolves in the six states survive legal challenges, each state will be required to manage a minimum of 300 wolves, the number biologists say constitutes a recovered population. Idaho, Montana and Wyoming intend to use public hunting and other methods to keep wolf populations down to what they consider a manageable size. Federal oversight would begin should numbers fall below the minimum 300.

In Idaho, where anti-wolf sentiments run high, Governor Butch Otter has called for the killing of 550 wolves, or 85 per cent of the state's wolf population.

Plans are under way to open a wolf hunting season, and Idaho wildlife officials have proposed killing off packs where they say wolves have caused unacceptable declines in popular game species, such as elk. While protected by the Endangered Species Act, it was generally illegal to kill wolves unless they were posing an imminent threat to life or property.

Readers' comments

your words

You say "we hunt all their food and just for the sport!" like your a hunter. I dont know about you but a lot of people hunt because it curbs their spending on food. Not everyone is all about a trophy or some pelt. Some people truly need the meat and want the meat.

THE WOLF HUNT

I love wolfs, but ranchers hate them. Wolfs do occationally attack and kill sheep and other livestock. Yet there is a solution to this problem. If the federal government would reemburse ranchers loses, there would be no argument on this matter. The ranchers would be made whole, and at a small expense to the government. People on my side would be happy to see these wonderful beasts protected, and ranches would have no financial loses from the packs. To reopen the wolf hunt only proves our reliance on violence to solve problems, and at the expense of these intelligent and loving animals. This seems to be the only way humans can fix their problems. We have the power of God over the other animals on this planet, and we repeatedly abuse this power by harming rather than protecting. This is only one more sad day in our long history of animal abuse. I wonder, will we ever truely love animals.

Wolf Hunt

All of the people that are against this wolf hunt I have a question for. Have any of you had a family pet killed by a wolf or watched a wolf pace back and forth just off your lawn watching your children play? I'm going to guess not. I've had both happen and I have actually had 3 family dogs killed by wolves. How can you put a price tag on a family dog and tell your children, Hey they gave us X amount of money to cover him no big deal. You antis make me sick with saying that there doesn't need to be a hunting season. What needs to be done is release a pack of wolves in the capital of each state with a population and see how all the city people like the wolves when their killing your beloved poodles. I bet there would be something done then wouldn't there!? There's one solution EXTERMINATION!!

hunting wolves

The one thing everyone is missing here is that they never said anything about killing all of them. Look at black bear for example. They allow so many tags a year and of them only a percentage actually harvest a bear. Uh oh wait you mean they have a season and are not all harvested hm... its called CONSERVATION some of you do it daily. Nobody ever said that they were going to allow people to just kill a wolf any time or anywhere. They, much like many animals, will have a season and be monitored. Another example is bobcats. You don't see them being depleted because of that magic word. CONSERVATION! Don't forget about the family pet, you never know where a hungry wolf may be. Wolves can, will and have been found in the city next to schools. One was killed in southern wisconsin by a bowhunter that was hunting withing sight of a school yard filled with children.

Conservation....

Are we God to decide a faith and proper number of a species?
Who decided it is ok for humans to breed like cancer on this planet? (4M babies/year just in the USA)
Are you righteous enough not to bring 3-4 kids into this world?
Maybe we should put some sort of a percentage or number system on human population.

I agree

Most people would be saying that killing the wolves like this is hostile and disguisting. But most people haven't researched the topic and are just speaking off the top of their heads. So i'm happy you decided to look these facts up and post it so you can let people know what is really happening, besides their frustrating lies. ^_^

huntng wolfs

Instead of hunting wolves we should hunt and kill the people who wish to kill the wolves. The world would be a better place.

Population

All things need population control.
Period.

Population control and feeding wolves

Yes, because we seem to be doing a GREAT job controlling the human population.

But anyways, here... if it makes everyone happy, I'll move to one of those highly wolf-dense states (like Idaho or Wyoming), start a rabbit farm (cuz rabbits breed like teenagers), and invite ALL the wolves to come and stuff their faces whenever they want. Then, the wolves will have food, the moose huggers can have their mooses (seriously, what's the plural form of moose?), the wolf huggers will have their wolves, and all the ranchers can rest in peace knowing their livestock aren't the object of the hunt.

Who knows, maybe the government will fund me. :)
Someone let me know if anyone decides to take me seriously?

It's disgusting

This is just WRONG! This is not OKAY. If the public had to vote this would be voted out. Your killing animals that are not even over populated. These are animals that we have in zoo's because people view these animals like we never get to see them!!!!! I don't understand any of this. But it has to be put to a stop. It's very sick and wrong. It has no purpose! SCREW WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN THIS CASE!! Some sport this is..