The grey wolf will be removed from the endangered species list in at least three U.S. states, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Credit: Wikimedia
SALMON, Idaho: Legal wolf hunting will is set to resume in the U.S. for the first time in decades, after wildife authorities announced plans to remove the wolf from the endangered species list in at least three states.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director H. Dale Hall said the decision was taken because the wolves had been successfully re-populated. "We're extremely proud to be announcing the recovery of the wolf," he said.
Hall and other officials said removing federal protections for the 4,000 wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and proposing to lift them for the 1,200 wolves in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming is proof that the Endangered Species Act, the nation's landmark conservation law, works.
Under both plans, states would have the authority to manage their wolf populations as they see fit so long as they maintain enough wolves to ensure their survival.
Wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin will be de-listed in a matter of weeks, while it will take a year to complete the public hearings and other requirements to remove wolves from the list in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.
Conservation groups hailed the plan for wolves in the Great Lakes region, applauding Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for what they said were wolf-management plans that will ensure the survival of the species. But they heaped criticism on plans by Idaho and Wyoming.
"Idaho and Wyoming have state management plans that are geared toward wolf eradication, not wolf conservation," said U.S. non-profit Defenders of Wildlife president Rodger Schlickeisen in a statement.
Wolves in the United States were hunted to near-extinction a century ago under government-sponsored elimination programs designed to protect livestock. By 1974, when wolves were classified as endangered, the only documented wolf packs in the lower 48 states were in Minnesota and Michigan.
In 1995, federal wildlife biologists released 66 wolves into the wilds of central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in the hope they would re-establish themselves in their native range. But the wolf's restoration in the western regions has been greeted with outrage by ranchers and hunters, who make up the region's most powerful lobbies.
They contend wolves are a nuisance, threatening livestock and causing declines in big-game populations. They have campaigned tirelessly to persuade state political leaders and federal officials that their numbers should be cut dramatically.
If the proposals to de-list wolves in the six states survive legal challenges, each state will be required to manage a minimum of 300 wolves, the number biologists say constitutes a recovered population. Idaho, Montana and Wyoming intend to use public hunting and other methods to keep wolf populations down to what they consider a manageable size. Federal oversight would begin should numbers fall below the minimum 300.
In Idaho, where anti-wolf sentiments run high, Governor Butch Otter has called for the killing of 550 wolves, or 85 per cent of the state's wolf population.
Plans are under way to open a wolf hunting season, and Idaho wildlife officials have proposed killing off packs where they say wolves have caused unacceptable declines in popular game species, such as elk. While protected by the Endangered Species Act, it was generally illegal to kill wolves unless they were posing an imminent threat to life or property.


WHAT!!!
Listen to yourself your talking as if these creatures dont have feelings or the people that really enjoy having these beuatifull animals around
to shoot or not to shoot???
you have no idea what you are talking about so just dont...."we as humans are over populated and you dont see us killing each other to keep out popoulation at the right level" were not telling the wolves to kill each other and thats n0t what they are doing we are managing them so they dont take over the animal society if wolves became extremely overpopulated it would just switch the wolves with big game (deer elk...) on the endagered species list. we are not promoting slaughter just to keep everything in check
I whis I could get my gun
I whis I could get my gun and shot all the people who kill relatives of the dog. They should be punished for all the wolfes they killed. I want them to stop so they will live.
hunting wolves
Of course tree huggers will freak out because they are going to open up wolf hunting. They say "what if someone hunted you down and killed you?" How stupid!!! Tree huggers don't realize how much of a dent it makes on ranchers when wolves kill their cattle. sometimes i wish that tree huggers would shut up and just let the government do their thing.
yes wolves do kill livestock
yes wolves do kill livestock but dont you think we can come up with something a little more creative then just death. Wolves want to eat to they dont have grocerie stores or refrigeraters. and some wolves dont have packs to help them kill elk or dear or moose. I thought humans were smarter than that. why dont you just read about wolves maybe it would cange your mind. just because we are at the top of the food chane doesnt mean animals dont have fealings they are a family. and killing just one can have a huge impact on the whole family. its just barbaric and wrong.
this article is just plain
this article is just plain sick!! they aay they are proud to have re-populated the wolves and that the wolf population has increased but come on.. what is this!!! so because the wolf population isn't being endangered they've decided to allow people to hunt them again.. how would you like it if you were been shot down..god!! this is just horrible..
ethics
I fail to see what ethical principal drives the above comment...
If there is a difference between hunting wolves and hunting any other animal, it's due to some weird emotional classification I can't seem to grasp. Regarding 'how would you like to be shot'...I don't think the 'golden rule' of 'do unto others as you would have done to yourself' applies across species...or at least not by any ethical code I have ever seen, minus that of Buddhism, or some weird hippy-dom. But, then again, Buddhism applies to all other animals; that is consistent, whereas making an exception for rules makes no sense whatsoever.
The only complaint against hunting wolves as opposed to other animals would be that it was a waste of money for the Feds to reintroduce just to have some of the wolves killed, but then again I don't think you'd find many people arguing against the inefficiency of that whole program...
People, seriously. Wolves
People, seriously. Wolves have feelings, ok!! I can tell you as a hunter I feel remorse for the animals I harvest. I can assure you wolves do not feel that same remorse, though we are hunting for the same reason, food. As a hunter, my tax dollars, license fees, habitat stamps and donations go directly to the conservation of wildlife, not to the slaughter of wildlife. Hunters fund the majority of wildlife conservation and more importantly by allowing hunting the animal herds are kept at safe levels. Do not let your emotions make your judgements, if wolves have a healthy population and not an overpopulation they will remain strong and continue to flourish. If they overpopulate an area they will become malnutritioned or become diseased. This is the natural order. Unfortunately humans have become over populated. As a direct result we have become the managers of the environment. This includes the animal population. Conservation takes on many forms, population control through hunting is one of many tools that need to take place in order to keep the right balance. It is much the same as using prescribed burns in overly dense forest to keep a balanced ecosystem. No wildlife management department is going to allow the senseless slaughter of an entire species. That is foolish. Do not be so quick to jump to conclusions. Be rational and become educated on the benefits that hunters bring to the conservation of wildlife. Conservation is at the top of the priority list for all hunters.
wolf hunting
yes wolfs do eat our livestock but if they had more food they they would hunt that. do you think that they like going near you? we hunt all their food and just for sport! it not like you eat the meat or or use the pelt for anything but a prize!
this is stupid
If you hunt wolves again all its going to do is make their population go way down again ,and once again wolves would be in serious danger of dying out again. Wolves arn't some mindless robot walking around for you to shoot them they have feelings. We're not shooting each other to keep our population down. If you take the population of wolves down then the population of deer will rise to high. If deer overpopulate they'll run out of food bringing their population way to low and we'll wipe out 2 species by killing one. Its wrong to kill one in the first place.