The grey wolf will be removed from the endangered species list in at least three U.S. states, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Credit: Wikimedia
SALMON, Idaho: Legal wolf hunting will is set to resume in the U.S. for the first time in decades, after wildife authorities announced plans to remove the wolf from the endangered species list in at least three states.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director H. Dale Hall said the decision was taken because the wolves had been successfully re-populated. "We're extremely proud to be announcing the recovery of the wolf," he said.
Hall and other officials said removing federal protections for the 4,000 wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and proposing to lift them for the 1,200 wolves in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming is proof that the Endangered Species Act, the nation's landmark conservation law, works.
Under both plans, states would have the authority to manage their wolf populations as they see fit so long as they maintain enough wolves to ensure their survival.
Wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin will be de-listed in a matter of weeks, while it will take a year to complete the public hearings and other requirements to remove wolves from the list in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.
Conservation groups hailed the plan for wolves in the Great Lakes region, applauding Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for what they said were wolf-management plans that will ensure the survival of the species. But they heaped criticism on plans by Idaho and Wyoming.
"Idaho and Wyoming have state management plans that are geared toward wolf eradication, not wolf conservation," said U.S. non-profit Defenders of Wildlife president Rodger Schlickeisen in a statement.
Wolves in the United States were hunted to near-extinction a century ago under government-sponsored elimination programs designed to protect livestock. By 1974, when wolves were classified as endangered, the only documented wolf packs in the lower 48 states were in Minnesota and Michigan.
In 1995, federal wildlife biologists released 66 wolves into the wilds of central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in the hope they would re-establish themselves in their native range. But the wolf's restoration in the western regions has been greeted with outrage by ranchers and hunters, who make up the region's most powerful lobbies.
They contend wolves are a nuisance, threatening livestock and causing declines in big-game populations. They have campaigned tirelessly to persuade state political leaders and federal officials that their numbers should be cut dramatically.
If the proposals to de-list wolves in the six states survive legal challenges, each state will be required to manage a minimum of 300 wolves, the number biologists say constitutes a recovered population. Idaho, Montana and Wyoming intend to use public hunting and other methods to keep wolf populations down to what they consider a manageable size. Federal oversight would begin should numbers fall below the minimum 300.
In Idaho, where anti-wolf sentiments run high, Governor Butch Otter has called for the killing of 550 wolves, or 85 per cent of the state's wolf population.
Plans are under way to open a wolf hunting season, and Idaho wildlife officials have proposed killing off packs where they say wolves have caused unacceptable declines in popular game species, such as elk. While protected by the Endangered Species Act, it was generally illegal to kill wolves unless they were posing an imminent threat to life or property.

Wolves
It is a sad story to spend all this time, effort and money to establish these packs to some extend and allow the lobbying groups to move towards almost eradicating them again.
With all the studies of relationship between eating beef and
- obesity,
- cancer
- general life expectancy
PLUS
- cattle's effects on the land as well as on the greenhouse effect.
It would make more sense to lower the number of cattle herds.
slaughter of Wolf
This makes me sick! What in the hell is wrong with these people?? how would they like to be hunted down and slaughtered!
to shoot or not to shoot
you are right in your thinking "Slaughter of wolves" we as humes ar OVER POPULATED and you don't see us killing each other to keep out population a the right level. it is the same conspet. so hunter think about it "to shoot or NOT to shoot"
humans...
Well isn't abortion designed for regulating the over population of humans... come on, if the federal and state agencies manage the hunting seasons, an appropriate and healthy amount of wolves will be harvested. This should not adversely affect the wolves. And we live in a democracy, we elect officials that we hope will put into action laws that align with our views. If you don't like how things are handled, vote for someone else or maybe even just vote for once!
Wake Up
I do vote but there are people out there that just like to kill things to wacth them die and i think you might be one of them. By the wat abortion is not for regulating the human population it is for mothers/women who don't want their baby.
Wolfs, Abortion and You
You are right, abortion is the murder of the smallest and most innocent of humans; however, we are comparing apples and oranges. Wolfs are not humans. Wolfs are animals and humans kill animals. That is what we do, just as wolfs kill elk and other animal. For an individual to take the stance that the killing of animals is bad, the individual is either a vegetarian that does not wear or use any animal products, i.e. eat no eggs, does not wear leather shoes, use cosmetics tested on animals, etc. Or, the individual is a liar and a hypocrite.
Death is a part of the world we live in. Everything must eventually pass away. And, humans kill to fill their needs, i.e. trees are killed to build homes, ants and other pest are killed to make life more enjoyable, and people kill wild animals for a plethora of reasons. Yes, I hunt. I also know hundreds of other hunters and none of them hunts for the joy of watching an animal die. Hunters do hunt for the sport of it (not to watch the suffering of animals but for the sport/skill of the hunt), for food, trophies, clothing, etc.
Wolfs are no different from any other animal. To say that wolfs should not be hunted when they become overpopulated is to say no animal should be hunted or killed, even if it is for humans to eat and endure.
"death is part of the world we live in"
i know it is, but how would like to die?
you do know we're an animal too right?
OVERPOPULATED HA!!!
If it is for the sport/skill why not dart them and put a radio collar on them?
If you want to hunt overpopulated animals why not try house sparrows or European starlings? they kill too but not for food just for the nest of the bird they kill! and they kill chicks and crack eggs open too!!!
wolf management is needed
One of the big problems here is...the wolves really are OVER-populated in this area of the country. At the rate that their populations are growing and spreading, conflict is bound to occur. Ranchers in this area are losing out on a part of their livelihood due to predation from wolves (granted it is not a whole lot), and elk populations in the area are being depleted. There needs to be a balance in the whole thing and, with an appropriately designed management plan that incorporates hunting, we can generate revenue from license sales (which pays to protect all of our wildlife that are not doing as well by the way), take pressure off of the ranches by harvesting the problem packs first, and take pressure off of some of the critical elk populations that serve a vital role in ecosystem processes.
I know it is hard for a lot of you to imagine the killing of cute little, fuzzy little wolfies, but you are probably not very familiar with the area and the degree of this issue. It is very easy to criticize people for making a call about something when it doesn't directly affect your well being like it does for many of the citizens in this part of the country.
I disagree with you
The wolf is not OVER-populated. Humans are why else do you think that the wolf was placed back on the endangered species list? There are illegal groups out there that are even gassing innocent pups and mothers to death in their dens! And they will say they are mangaging the poplutation when the population is no where near being over populated. So tell me. Would you allow groups like that to run free if they wolf is taken of the list again in those states? Because they are certainly bent on doing so should they get a free previlige to do so.