COSMOS magazine

Get COSMOS Teacher's Notes
  • Add this story to stumbleupon
  • Add this story to Yahoo Buzz
  • Add this story to Digg
  • Add this story to reddit
  • Add this story to Slashdot
  • Add this story to newsvine
  • Add this story to facebook
  • Add this story to technorati
  • Add this story to del-icio-us
  • Add this story to furl

Feature - print

Six things you didn't know about human missions to Mars


Why the first astronauts to Mars may never come back, why a Martian colony is unlikely to revolt against Earth and more...


Single page print view

Home away from home: Landers would shelter the first wave of Mars explorers, until more permanent accommodation could be arranged, perhaps underground. As depicted in the illustration, living conditions would be cramped and not dissimilar to those endured by Antarctic explorers.

Credit: ESA

Read all about human missions to Mars here in Next stop: Mars

1. The first astronauts to Mars may never come back

Much of the difficulty of going to Mars is providing for a return journey. But what if the first colonists never came back?

Most people react to this suggestion with instinctive horror. I recall my own sense of discomfort when I met an ageing American scientist who claimed to have trained for a one-way mission to the Moon in the pre-Apollo days. But Mars isn’t the Moon. With the right equipment, astronauts could live there for years. A one-way trip to Mars isn’t a suicide mission.

An initial colony of four astronauts, equipped with a small nuclear reactor and a couple of rover vehicles, could make their own oxygen, grow food and even initiate building projects using local raw materials. Supplemented by shipments from home, the colony could be sustained indefinitely, and eventually become self-sufficient. To be sure, the living conditions would be cramped and uncomfortable, but so was the Antarctic for explorers a century ago.

Most of the danger of space flight lies in launches and landings, as the two shuttle disasters horrifically demonstrated. Eliminating the trip home would therefore slash the overall risk of the mission. Obviously this strategy carries its own risks, but there would be no shortage of volunteers. A century ago, explorers set out to trek across Antarctica in the full knowledge they could die in the process. Why should it be different today?

Would NASA entertain the idea of a one-way policy for human Mars exploration? Probably not. But other, more adventurous space agencies might. A joint Indian-Chinese colony on Mars by 2100 is not only technologically feasible, it is also politically realistic. The next giant leap for humankind won’t come without risk. — Paul Davies, Director of Beyond, a ‘cosmic thinktank’ at Arizona State University.

2. Mars astronauts may burrow beneath the surface

Beautiful as it is, the surface of Mars is an inhospitable place, lacking water and oxygen, subject to unearthly cold, bathed in radiation and host to blinding dust storms. Many scientists think that to get away from these problems, the way to go is down.

Many of the craters on Mars are volcanic and share features with similar craters on Earth. These include lava tubes, formed when lava begins to cool and solidify. On Earth, lava tubes have provided shelter for creatures as diverse as hawks, iguanas, goats and pirates. On Mars, they may supply ready-made ‘rooms’ for living and storage.

It would be good to have metres of dirt over your head and around you, anyhow, to shield from radiation and insulate from the cold. Models of habitats on both the Moon and Mars have often involved the excavation of regolith, to be piled on and around prefabricated structures. But if lava tubes turn out to be common just beneath the Martian surface, colonists may be able to use these ready-made tunnels and save significant time, energy, and resources. — Joe Haldeman, science fiction writer and author of The Forever War.

3. The key to surviving a long missions to Mars is being with people who know how to laugh.

Whatever else happens on the first mission to Mars, the crew won’t be bored. I’ve been to Mars plenty of times myself, so I know from experience. OK, I’ve not actually been to the Red Planet. But in several simulated missions conducted out of the Mars Society’s Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station, located some 1,400 kilometres from the North Pole, I’ve gained some insights.

Despite the fact the crew will be on Mars for a year-and-a-half, there will be plenty to do. Between field exploration, laboratory work, reportage, equipment repair and daily chores, the workload will be intense. Forget psychological studies of bored navy personnel at isolated postings pining for the bright lights of San Diego. Such types won’t be on the mission. Instead there will be scientists who have waited and trained for years to get a chance to go to Mars. Their chief problem won’t be boredom, but overwork. I’ve seen this with my own crews at Flashline Station, where I repeatedly had to order scientific teams to stop at 9 pm.

Some have worried about crews forced to live in tight quarters, but this shouldn’t be a problem. Given the right band of comrades, who like each other, trust each other and can laugh at the inevitable frustrations, malfunctions, mistakes, and screw-ups, the problem of long-term close confinement can be dealt with in stride.

The key? When you go to Mars, make sure you do it with people who know how to laugh. — Robert Zubrin, aerospace engineer and founder of the Mars Society.