Conceptual computer artwork of multiple universes: Some physicists believe that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, created for each possible quantum mechanical outcome. The collective name for these universes is the multiverse.
Credit: Mehau Kulyk/SPL
Ask the average scientist about the possibility of an encounter with an extra-terrestrial lifeform, and it's likely you'll find you've prompted 'the giggle factor'. After rolling their eyes, they remind you that the distances between stars are so vast, it's virtually impossible for any aliens to visit us.
But a potential flaw is assuming an extraterrestrial civilisation would be only a few hundred years ahead of us in technology. How about civilisations that may be a million years ahead of ours?
The late scientist and author Carl Sagan once asked: "What does it mean for a civilisation to be a million years old? We have had radio telescopes and spaceships for a few decades; our technical civilisation is a few hundred years old ... an advanced civilisation millions of years old is as much beyond us as we are beyond a bushbaby or a macaque."
This question is no longer just a matter of idle speculation. Soon, humanity may face an existential shock as we discover Earth-sized twins of our planet orbiting nearby solar systems. This may usher in a new era in our relationship with the universe, so that we will never see the night sky in the same way. Realising that scientists may eventually compile an encyclopaedia identifying the precise coordinates of perhaps hundreds of Earth-like planets, gazing at the night sky, we will forever after wonder if someone is gazing back at us.
Every few weeks, yet another planet about the size of Jupiter is discovered outside our solar system, adding to the list of several hundred extrasolar planets that have been discovered in the short period we've been searching. The problem is, most are too large to sustain the kind of complex life that, from our one example here on Earth, we know.
But over the next few years, new spaceborne telescopes will finally become powerful enough to identify twins of Earth. The Kepler telescope, to be launched in 2008, will probably be able to identify terrestrial planets – rocky worlds rather than gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn. Until 2012 it will scan as many as 100,000 Sun-like stars up to 2,000 light years away, and perhaps identify hundreds of Earth-like worlds by detecting the slight loss of light they cause as they pass in front of their mother star. Kepler will hopefully identify 185 such planets with less than 1.3 times the radius of Earth, and as many as 640 terrestrial planets less than 2.2 times.
Kepler will pave the way for the Terrestrial Planet Finder, expected to be launched in about 2014, which should identify an even greater number of Earth-like planets. It will scan the brightest 1,000 stars within 50 light years of our tiny home world, and focus on the 50 to 100 brightest planetary systems. Also, it will analyse the faint light reflected from these planets to determine if they can support the organic chemicals that make life possible.
All this, in turn, will stimulate an active effort to discover if any of them harbour life, perhaps some with civilisations more advanced than ours. Although it's impossible to predict exact features of such civilisations, their broad outlines can be analysed using the laws of physics. No matter how many aeons separate us from them, they still must obey the laws of physics – which we have determined to such an extent that we can explain the behaviour of the cosmos from the subatomic world to the large-scale structure of the universe, through a staggering 43 orders of magnitude (a factor of 10 million billion billion billion billion).
Civilisations may be ranked by their energy consumption, using the following principles:
• The four laws of thermodynamics describe transport of heat and work. Even an advanced civilisation is bound by the laws of thermodynamics, especially the First and Second, and can hence be ranked by the energy at its disposal. The first law states that "energy can be changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed". While, "in all energy exchanges, if no energy enters or leaves the system, the total amount of disorder always increases" is the second law.
• The laws of stable matter. Matter in the universe clumps into three large groupings: planets, stars and galaxies. This is a well-defined structural product of stellar and galactic evolution, thermonuclear fusion, and so on. Thus, the energy of a hyper-advanced civilisation will also be based on three distinct types, and this places upper limits on their rate of energy consumption.
• The laws of planetary evolution. Any advanced civilisation must grow in energy consumption faster than the frequency of life-threatening catastrophes, such as meteor impacts, ice ages, supernova explosions, and so on. If their growth rate stays any slower, they are doomed to extinction. Thus, this places mathematical lower limits on the growth rates of these civilisations.
In a seminal paper published in 1964 in the Journal of Soviet Astronomy, Russian astrophysicist Nicolai Kardashev theorised that advanced civilisations must thus be grouped according to three Types: I, II and III, signifying mastery of, respectively, planetary, stellar and galactic forms of energy usage. He calculated that the energy consumption of these three types of civilisations would be separated by a factor of about 10 billion.
Human civilisation has only recently begun to master planetary energies: fossil fuels, passive solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear fission, and may one day soon crack nuclear fusion. But how long will it take to reach Type II and III status? Less time than most realise.
Our entire planetary energy production is now about 10 billion billion ergs per second (an erg is a unit of measurement, equal to 10-7 joules). That sounds like a lot, but it's actually a small fraction of the energy we receive from the Sun. The Earth is bathed with about one billionth of its mother star's energy – we utilise about one millionth of that.
But our energy growth is rising exponentially, and we can calculate how long it will take to rise to Type II or III status. "Look how far we have come in energy uses once we figured out how to manipulate energy, how to get fossil fuels really going, and how to create electrical power from hydropower, and so forth," says Donald Goldsmith, a University of California at Berkeley astronomer and author. "We've come up in energy uses by a remarkable amount in just a couple of centuries compared to billions of years our planet has been here ... and this same sort of thing may apply to other civilisations."
Freeman Dyson, a physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, estimates that, within a century or two, we should attain Type I status. In fact, growing at a modest rate of 1 per cent per year, Kardashev estimated that it would take only 3,200 years to reach Type II status, and 5,800 years to reach Type III status.


Missing Matter and Energy
we can explain the behaviour of the cosmos from the subatomic world to the large-scale structure of the universe, through a staggering 43 orders of magnitude
If our current theories of the composition of the Universe omit reasonably complete explanations of the nature of Dark Energy (74% of totality) and Dark Matter (22% of totality), then we are left with a theory that extends to only ~4% of what is. That explanatory gap seems to be not quite in accordance with the sentiment expressed above.
There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement".
Wjhat?
Staggering 43 orders of magnitude?
What if there are 43.632657 orders of magnitude?
What is the common dimension linking width, depth, dipth and wedth?
How many planes are there in a square?
What is a prime number and why is it important?
What if reality is not linear?
What if, after going there, you discover it isn't what you expected?
What if all you've explained is your own overwhelmingly intense desire to swallow the entirety of everything in a single mouthful, and choked on the attempt?
How about using that calculation on yourself?
Can you explain how I type this?
Isn't biology part of the cosmos?
How many layers are there in an atomic structure?
How many layers are there in a tomic structure?
What's a tomic structure?
What is an a-tomic structure?
Why is it important?
Where is the "world" processor kept?
How many MIPS is it?
How fast can you think?
Why can't you stop the war in IRAQ or prevent the war in Iran?
Can any of your 43 orders of magnitude explain the quantity of dishonesty and it's consequential stupidity in the current President of the United States?
Why do we need a government anyway. Can't each of us think for ourselves?
Why do we need someone else to define our own reality?
What is the purpose of your
What is the purpose of your questions?
What is your problem?
Your comment astounds me...
Your comment astounds me... "Why can't you stop the war in IRAQ or prevent the war in Iran?" Because I'm one person. "Why do we need a government anyway. Can't each of us think for ourselves?", yes, we can. Hence, democracy. "Can you explain how I type this?" Yes, but I wont get into it here. "What if there are 43.632657 orders of magnitude?" There are, he was referring to the orders of magnitude between quantum existence and the magnitude of the cosmos. "What if reality is not linear?" I cannot believe a sentient being would ask this question. "What is the common dimension linking width, depth, dipth and wedth?" Energy. "What's a tomic structure?" Go to high school. "
The entirety of human existence is "your own overwhelmingly intense desire to swallow the entirety of everything in a single mouthful", and to tell someone that they've "choked on the attempt" is extremely ignorant and uncalled for; childish if you will. "Why is it important?": Because it is. Because the people we love in our little individual lives are part of the same empire we are - because we're humans - because we've felt pain and suffering and the pangs of starvation - because we can grasp the power of the atom - because we can expand - because we exist. Because we can. Please, look around you and understand how much you can't possibly imagine yet. Revel in your primitive mind - know that there is SO much more to know, and love life for it.
About the article: Great job - I absolutely love Sagan and anything Asimov-ish. Reading this, I couldn't help but remember the Foundation series from Asimov. The day will come when we can split open an atom - the day will come when lossless superconductors bring endless life-giving energy from distant fusion plants - when hunger, poverty, crime and injustice are a joke of the past. When there are no haves and have nots - when there is enough energy at the disposal of every human being, we realize how wonderful the universe is.
I __love__ the idea of a probe laying dormant until a time when a civilization could cope with its existence.
hi
one word to your energy solution
entropy
probe laying dormant
"probe laying dormant until a time when a civilization could cope with its existence."
by the sounds of most of the replies regarding this article the probe will be laying dormant for quite alot longer.LOL
you forgot: "how many licks
you forgot:
"how many licks does it take to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop?"
Re: Wjhat?
Nice one.
Never say never!!!! we use
Never say never!!!!
we use our five senses to perceive our surroundings!!! much more is needed to understand the understanding of these civilisations or shall i say civilizations for those of you who at one hand are talking about infinity but, on the other hand, just don't wanna stop justifying the right phonetics..
Any way!!! it was hard for the scientist of yesteryears to visualise the advancements of today;s science. Sameway, our naive ind is not ready to go beyond the self-drawn limits of understanding!!!
The git is that we can't say that nothing more is left to discover. Narrowing down is one approach!! looking for more avenues is other.. we need to change the way we perceive ideas.. Sky is the limit :)
Never say never
Never say never!!!!
we use our five senses to perceive our surroundings!!! much more is needed to understand the understanding of these civilisations or shall i say civilizations for those of you who at one hand are talking about infinity but, on the other hand, just don't wanna stop justifying the right phonetics..
Any way!!! it was hard for the scientist of yesteryears to visualise the advancements of today's science. Sameway, our naive mind is not ready to go beyond the self-drawn limits of understanding!!!
The gist is that we can't say that nothing more is left to discover. Narrowing down is one approach!! looking for more avenues is another.. we need to change the way we perceive ideas.. Sky is the limit :)