Credit: Emrah Elmasli
Albert Einstein claimed he never thought about the future. "It comes soon enough," he would say. And you can see his point. What would have been the good of worrying about our destiny when it was not of our making?
But life has changed since the great physicist's day. Sweeping changes of our own creation now beset our world: carbon emissions, soaring populations, cloning, rising extinction rates.
We are changing our planet and its biosphere in ways that were once unimaginable. We are also developing lifesaving technologies that would have appeared equally incredible a few decades ago. Everywhere we witness change. But what will this bring and how will it affect our world?
In this article, we address these questions in detail and explore the issues involved, concerns that will shape the existence and lifestyles of ourselves and our children. Some, notably those involved in medical research, look very hopeful. Others, especially those concerned with climate and biodiversity, look far less optimistic. Indeed, they appear downright disturbing.
Overall, it is sobering stuff, though we should not be too downhearted about our prospects for life in 2020. As that other great guru of the 20th century, Charles M. Schulz, creator of the 'Peanuts' cartoon, once observed: "You needn't worry about the world coming to an end today. It is already tomorrow in Australia."
Hot in the city
WHATEVER else we experience in 2020, the impact of climate change will be inescapable. That's the clear message from virtually every scientist working in the field. Last century saw global atmospheric temperatures rising by 0.6˚C; in the next decade and a half, we can expect much the same.
"Climate change will become particularly noticeable at the poles," says James Lovelock, the British scientist who developed the Gaia hypothesis, the idea that life itself makes existence tolerable on Earth. "By 2020, the North Pole will be becoming free of ice, and by the end of the decade we will be able to sail straight across it. At the same time, the great glaciers of the southern hemisphere and the West Antarctic ice sheet will be breaking up."
The seas will rise dramatically, flooding Earth's low-lying areas. Thus, by 2020, we will have a very good idea of the fate that is awaiting our planet: heat, flooding and desertification. "Essentially, for most people on the planet, it will be like living through war," warns Lovelock. "It will be grim, but we are all going to have to stick together in our own communities."
It is an apocalyptic vision. Nevertheless, Lovelock – one of the world's most distinguished climate experts – is not alone in his prognosis. Graeme Pearman, of Australia's national science agency, the CSIRO, also forecasts cataclysmic changes. "The Great Barrier Reef is already suffering from serious bleaching," he says. "Temperature increases are killing off the coral and, with another one-degree increase in global temperatures in prospect, we are going to see serious damage being done to it. Not just from bleaching, but from damage from ever-worsening storms that are yet another consequence of global warming." (See also 'The late Great Barrier Reef', Cosmos 9, p 32).
Around 90 per cent of people living today will still be alive in 2020, so these disturbances will touch almost every family on Earth. Neither can we do anything to halt them. Increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide that have already taken place make them inevitable. Preventing even greater horrors should therefore be a scientific and political priority for the next decade and a half, says Tim Flannery, professor at Macquarie University in Sydney and author of the climatic bestseller, The Weather Makers. And, most importantly, a new and comprehensive policy for curbing carbon emissions both at home and in the workplace is now desperately needed. As Flannery points out: "It's now too late to avoid changing our world. But we still have time, if good policy is implemented, to avoid disaster."
It's life, Jim
NO FORECAST for 2020 would be complete without attempting to answer one of the most enduring questions in science: is there life elsewhere in the cosmos? And, if so, will we find it? The answer, according to Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the SETI Institute, in Mountain View, California, is a simple "Yes". By the end of the next decade we will have found evidence of extraterrestrial life. The only issue to be decided is how we will actually make that monumental discovery. And according to Shostak, it will be a three-horse race: between Earth-based radio telescopes, planetary probes, and space telescopes.
In the first category, radio telescopes will probe the skies to pick up signals sent out by alien civilisations – either deliberate 'here we are' messages or old episodes of their equivalent of TV show Neighbours that have been leaking out across space since they were broadcast. And of all the instruments designed to detect these interstellar signals, the Allen Telescope Array – a joint project between SETI (which stands for Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) and the University of California at Berkeley – is now rated the machine most likely to succeed. Consisting of some 350 separate radio telescopes, the array went into operation earlier in 2006 and, by searching the skies 24 hours a day, we should hit pay dirt sometime between 2020 and 2025, says Shostak.
Then there are the space telescopes, and in particular NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder mission, and the Darwin Mission of the European Space Agency, which will hover in deep space and study the atmospheres of extrasolar planets (those beyond our Solar System) for telltale signs of oxygen, ozone and methane – gases that would indicate the presence of life. Both missions have been delayed by budget problems but are still likely to be in space by 2020. "They could still win the race," says Shostak, "but are outsiders at present."
And finally, there are planetary probes. Among these will be missions to land spacecraft on Mars as well as to visit the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, worlds that have ice-covered oceans where primitive lifeforms may be found. "My money is one of these winning the race – particularly a Mars mission," adds Shostak. "Certainly, I am sure by 2020 or thereabouts, we will have good evidence that we have neighbours somewhere in the galaxy and will know that life is really just a form of dirty chemistry that happens on lots of worlds."


Regarding this comment:
Regarding this comment: Submitted by sci_guy on 25 October 2007 - 10:02am.
---
The article states "Around 90 per cent of people living today will still be alive in 2020, so these disturbances will touch almost every family on Earth."
The submitted comment states, "You sound like Owl Gore when you predict 90% of us will be gone in 10 to 20 years."
---
A reading comprehension problem? Dyslexia?
Action needed NOW
Bottom line is we need to not just reduce our carbon emissions, but eliminate them and start rebuilding our atmosphere by planting trees, etc. We need to be proactive to get it through to the politicians, govt and make it law.
Bookended by global warming
"WHATEVER else we experience in 2020, the impact of climate change will be inescapable. That's the clear message from virtually every scientist working in the field."
It begins with a fallacy, and ends with a fallacy. This is a not so clever disguise of global warming lies.
Bookended by global warming
Ah...the sad and lingering cries of the denialist. There's some great user groups out there that you can join, like the Flat Earth Society, and the guys who are convinced the Lunar landing was filmed in a studio. I'm sure they'd welcome your insightful input.
I have to say I'm vastly amused by the denialists, largely because their rant is so hysterical - and I don't mean funny - that one wonders who's paying them to teeth gnash and pound their fists on so many forums. Perhaps you can define more clearly the lies? For example, the North West passage - did that not just open a few weeks back when Lovelock stated it would happen by 2020? Is NASA lying about the staggering loss of Artic ice - just this year? (see http://www.ipy.org). I, for one, would be delighted to toss my thesis into the fire and declare that we can merrily continue on a path of unlimited growth and unlimited consumption without paying some sort of price. Truly. I don't want my kids stuck with this issue, but there it is. Turning your back on it is like turning your back on a Mack truck - it's not got going to stop it.
Help! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
Oh no! Global warming will destroy the world in only ten years!
Oh, wait, isn't that what the eco-catastrophists said ten years ago?
And ten years before that also? (Or was it global cooling back then?)
I thought all coastal cities were supposed to be flooded by now?
Heck, I still hear a lot of them whining about the "ozone hole", which was debunked by pretty much all independent scientists decades ago. And thanks to the whiners we still have CFCs banned, even though they could not have had anything to with ozone depletion even if it had existed.
And of course 99% of all species were supposed to be extinct by now. Last time I checked there were still plenty of animals around.
Why does anyone still listen to these people, even though nothing they have predicted has ever come true?
climate change and rising seas
Question::
Experts state that the corals are bleaching subject to global warming in the shallow seas. So, if the seas are to rise due to melting of the ice packs, would not the increased depth of the sea reduce the temperature at the corals as they would not longer be at a shallow surface level? therefore would they recover from bleaching??
Just curious..
Life on earth
I regard any involvement of space in alleviating our problems as fanciful.
I believe also that our primary problem is over-population. Any technical or economic measures that are successful short-term will soon be negated by increased population bringing resource shortage and pollution. The West should take account of efforts in China, but this logic just doesn't seem to impinge on any other government's thinking, or even many scientist's thinking.
Reality of the situation
I don't understand why everyone is either going completely Sci-fi with this situation or being a pessimist and believing that the world will end. In 2020, I believe that everything will be much the same as it is now.. or if it is not going to be completely then there will still be familiarity in the place... what really can change drastically in the next 13 years?
Talking about the cycles in the earth, the carbon cycle, the nitrogen cycle etc etc.. when we think about the carbon cycle - is it not true that all of the carbon emmissions that we are emmitting into the atmosphere were once part of the cycle itself? As they were once trees (coal), crustations (oil, gas).. so really how much of an impact can we make by releasing dormant areas of the carbon cycle?
Is everyone nuts here? Why cannot everyone just face the facts... humanity will still exist in 2020.
Answer
If you have watched Inconvenient Truth you'd probably see the answer to your question; temperature is rising drastically, and it will keep on doing so. That it brings changes to our planet it does, what kind of changes we will see...
ps.that "some" animals are dying out, they do, that we are destroying nature, that gave us life/oxygen, we are, so...
The future
I read this and think about the 80s. I was told by all the future forcasters that by year 2000 I would have a flying car. Well where is it. Oh, by the way last I checked we made it past year 2000 and now everyone is yelling December 21, 2012 It all ends. If we spent half of the energy we use on predicting the future we could create the future we want to see.