COSMOS magazine

Get COSMOS Teacher's Notes
  • Add this story to stumbleupon
  • Add this story to Yahoo Buzz
  • Add this story to Digg
  • Add this story to reddit
  • Add this story to Slashdot
  • Add this story to newsvine
  • Add this story to facebook
  • Add this story to technorati
  • Add this story to del-icio-us
  • Add this story to furl

Feature - print

Life in 2020


It may be only a short while away, but the world in 2020 will be very different. Cosmos asked some of the world's leading scientists to forecast the future.


Single page print view

Life in 2020

Credit: Emrah Elmasli

Albert Einstein claimed he never thought about the future. "It comes soon enough," he would say. And you can see his point. What would have been the good of worrying about our destiny when it was not of our making?

But life has changed since the great physicist's day. Sweeping changes of our own creation now beset our world: carbon emissions, soaring populations, cloning, rising extinction rates.

We are changing our planet and its biosphere in ways that were once unimaginable. We are also developing lifesaving technologies that would have appeared equally incredible a few decades ago. Everywhere we witness change. But what will this bring and how will it affect our world?

In this article, we address these questions in detail and explore the issues involved, concerns that will shape the existence and lifestyles of ourselves and our children. Some, notably those involved in medical research, look very hopeful. Others, especially those concerned with climate and biodiversity, look far less optimistic. Indeed, they appear downright disturbing.

Overall, it is sobering stuff, though we should not be too downhearted about our prospects for life in 2020. As that other great guru of the 20th century, Charles M. Schulz, creator of the 'Peanuts' cartoon, once observed: "You needn't worry about the world coming to an end today. It is already tomorrow in Australia."

Hot in the city

WHATEVER else we experience in 2020, the impact of climate change will be inescapable. That's the clear message from virtually every scientist working in the field. Last century saw global atmospheric temperatures rising by 0.6˚C; in the next decade and a half, we can expect much the same.

"Climate change will become particularly noticeable at the poles," says James Lovelock, the British scientist who developed the Gaia hypothesis, the idea that life itself makes existence tolerable on Earth. "By 2020, the North Pole will be becoming free of ice, and by the end of the decade we will be able to sail straight across it. At the same time, the great glaciers of the southern hemisphere and the West Antarctic ice sheet will be breaking up."

The seas will rise dramatically, flooding Earth's low-lying areas. Thus, by 2020, we will have a very good idea of the fate that is awaiting our planet: heat, flooding and desertification. "Essentially, for most people on the planet, it will be like living through war," warns Lovelock. "It will be grim, but we are all going to have to stick together in our own communities."

It is an apocalyptic vision. Nevertheless, Lovelock – one of the world's most distinguished climate experts – is not alone in his prognosis. Graeme Pearman, of Australia's national science agency, the CSIRO, also forecasts cataclysmic changes. "The Great Barrier Reef is already suffering from serious bleaching," he says. "Temperature increases are killing off the coral and, with another one-degree increase in global temperatures in prospect, we are going to see serious damage being done to it. Not just from bleaching, but from damage from ever-worsening storms that are yet another consequence of global warming." (See also 'The late Great Barrier Reef', Cosmos 9, p 32).

Around 90 per cent of people living today will still be alive in 2020, so these disturbances will touch almost every family on Earth. Neither can we do anything to halt them. Increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide that have already taken place make them inevitable. Preventing even greater horrors should therefore be a scientific and political priority for the next decade and a half, says Tim Flannery, professor at Macquarie University in Sydney and author of the climatic bestseller, The Weather Makers. And, most importantly, a new and comprehensive policy for curbing carbon emissions both at home and in the workplace is now desperately needed. As Flannery points out: "It's now too late to avoid changing our world. But we still have time, if good policy is implemented, to avoid disaster."

It's life, Jim

NO FORECAST for 2020 would be complete without attempting to answer one of the most enduring questions in science: is there life elsewhere in the cosmos? And, if so, will we find it? The answer, according to Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the SETI Institute, in Mountain View, California, is a simple "Yes". By the end of the next decade we will have found evidence of extraterrestrial life. The only issue to be decided is how we will actually make that monumental discovery. And according to Shostak, it will be a three-horse race: between Earth-based radio telescopes, planetary probes, and space telescopes.

In the first category, radio telescopes will probe the skies to pick up signals sent out by alien civilisations – either deliberate 'here we are' messages or old episodes of their equivalent of TV show Neighbours that have been leaking out across space since they were broadcast. And of all the instruments designed to detect these interstellar signals, the Allen Telescope Array – a joint project between SETI (which stands for Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) and the University of California at Berkeley – is now rated the machine most likely to succeed. Consisting of some 350 separate radio telescopes, the array went into operation earlier in 2006 and, by searching the skies 24 hours a day, we should hit pay dirt sometime between 2020 and 2025, says Shostak.

Then there are the space telescopes, and in particular NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder mission, and the Darwin Mission of the European Space Agency, which will hover in deep space and study the atmospheres of extrasolar planets (those beyond our Solar System) for telltale signs of oxygen, ozone and methane – gases that would indicate the presence of life. Both missions have been delayed by budget problems but are still likely to be in space by 2020. "They could still win the race," says Shostak, "but are outsiders at present."

And finally, there are planetary probes. Among these will be missions to land spacecraft on Mars as well as to visit the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, worlds that have ice-covered oceans where primitive lifeforms may be found. "My money is one of these winning the race – particularly a Mars mission," adds Shostak. "Certainly, I am sure by 2020 or thereabouts, we will have good evidence that we have neighbours somewhere in the galaxy and will know that life is really just a form of dirty chemistry that happens on lots of worlds."

Readers' comments

Our weather experts can't

Our weather experts can't predict a 1 week forcast accurately,
but they can dictate what's going to happen 13 yrs.from now ??????

Let's make everyone feel bad

Seems we are at the peak of the 30 year enviromental doom and gloom cycle the liberal media does to keep their tax subsidies going. If this guy really knew the future, he's have a better job than this.

Perhaps if your comment made

Perhaps if your comment made any sense I could post a constructive rebuttal.

Doom and gloom fear mongering?

All you have to do is look around to see the changes already occurring. It may not happen by 2020, but it will happen.

I'm not convinced that global warming is something that humans can prevent. There have already been 5 great extinctions? Sounds like we're overdue for the 6th...

One track mind

It seems as though the author has a one track mind. I saw global warming sprinkled throughout the piece. Sorry, but most readers are going to see right through the "slant", a-la Albert Gore. It's not all bad, they did seem to put some thought into the article, they just ruined it with the leftist "sky is falling" bias. Perhaps more objectivity is in order.

All of it

Who knows, maybe the world, as we know it, will end in 2012, as a lot of us think. With the population so far down that it isn't enough to even impact the planet anymore, that way Gaia, can heal.

I love this one: "It sounds

I love this one:

"It sounds strange. Nevertheless, computer experts say in little over a decade, electronic pastimes will not only provide us with rich, textured, multicoloured images, they will allow us to play games with any number of people no matter where you – or they – are. "You could join in a team with your children and hunt aliens, or shoot down enemy aircraft, even though you are thousands of miles apart," says David Perry, head of the California-based company Game Consultants. "It will be the ultimate bonding experience."

Hello? You can do this now. You could do this 10 years ago! OOohh online video games. Was this article written in the 80's?

The world

It is the nature of the beast which is Earth. Get over it, prepare and then prepare for a resurgence of a dry world again.

Life will be much like it is now

I remember as a kid in the 1970's, they made much the same predictions then as they did now. I have a 1967 Popular Science Magazine where Walter Kronkite did a TV special on "life in the year 2000." Basically, it was where we would have a 32 hour work week, bases on the Moon, man on Mars, etc. Well, I'm afraid Uncle Walter was wrong on that one. I think 2020, we will be living much the same way as we are doing now or even 1970. In my house, with the exception of computers and video games, I could have had what I have now back in 1970. Air conditioning, color TV (my newest set I got in 1983, it was made in 1982, been watching it daily since then), microwave oven, etc.

Since the 1960's, they have said the cure for cancer was around the corner. I think we will make some progress but a cure, I don't know, it would be nice. Climate change, well, I just leave that up to God Himself, we are just along for the ride.

Don't forget, since the late 1940's, atomic fusion was always "30 years away."

Along for the ride, aye???

or in other words, who cares about whats gonna happen; I dont!!!