Credit: Emrah Elmasli
Robot dawn
FLOOR SWEEPING, dusting, window cleaning, picking up after the kids, sorting the laundry, folding clothes, ironing, tidying the house: such activities are the banes of our lives. Yet if engineers are right, by 2020, we may be able to forget such chores, thanks to the development of domestic robots.
"We already have grass-cutting robots the public have happily accepted scuttling around their gardens," says robotics expert Gordon Wyeth of Brisbane's University of Queensland. "Now robots able to walk and balance on two legs are becoming commonplace in laboratories, and computing power is constantly rising while costs fall."
As a result, home robots will be the next consumer 'must have' by 2020 when they will have become as ubiquitous as personal computers today. They will be smart, ready to attack their tasks out of the box and will team with humans and other smart robots.
"I am betting most home robots will end up being named and treated like pets of sorts," adds Wyeth. "It will create a whole new industry where major players will reap the rewards just as Microsoft has done with personal computers."
Smart dressing
ROBOTS WILL not have it all their own way, however. Indeed, they can expect to face considerable technological competition in the home, thanks to developments in materials science and nanotechnology. At the University of New South Wales in Sydney, for example, researchers – led by Rose Amal and Michael Brungs – are developing self-cleaning surfaces for use in hospitals as well as domestic kitchens and bathrooms. These surfaces will be coated with particles that absorb ultraviolet light at a particular wavelength, exciting electrons and giving the particles an oxidising quality stronger than any commercial bleach. The surfaces will also be designed so that droplets cannot form on them – water will run off, washing as it goes.
In addition, scientists are working on materials that will not only change our homes but will transform the way we dress through the creation of 'intelligent clothes'. Special fabrics, fitted with monitors, will study our health throughout the day, while we sleep, work and exercise. For example, at the University of Wollongong, south of Sydney, researchers have created a fabric that emits a groaning sound to warn sportsmen and women if they are stretching or moving in ways that could harm them.
Another concept being developed by scientists involves embedding clothes with mobile phone chips. "The idea is that if you get injured out hill-walking or skiing, sensors will detect physiological and temperature changes to your body," says Jane McCann of Derby University in England. "The garment will alert the mobile phone chip to call the nearest hospital."
Energy diversity
JUST HOW we power the technology that will be offered in 2020 depends on the world's response to the threat of atmospheric warming. If global agreements are reached soon over carbon emissions, major changes in power production should have begun to make an impact on life across the planet. New-generation nuclear plants, based on pressurised water reactors perfected by the French, Germans and Americans – along with wind, water and tidal power generators being developed across the globe – will spring up across the landscape and power our homes. Or perhaps thorium-based nuclear reactors – generating power while burning up old nuclear waste – might have been perfected by then and be operational (see Cosmos, Issue 8, p40).
"Energy systems will be a lot more diverse," says the CSIRO's Graeme Pearman. "Wind, wave and solar energy will become a lot more important. Similarly, cars will emit far less carbon dioxide: either we will drive the new generation of highly efficient diesel cars that are being developed, or hybrids that use a mix of electric power and petrol. However, cars running on fuel cells and hydrogen will not yet be upon us. As for four-wheel drives – we will hardly see them any more."
The consequence of greater energy diversification, and the fragmentation of habitats triggered by global warming, will also produce major changes in the manner and places in which we live. "In 2020, we will be witnessing the fragmentation of society," says James Lovelock. "Individual regions, never mind countries, will be compelled to depend on their own resources. We can expect a future not necessarily of misery but of privation and austerity."


Life in 2020
Scientists of this day cannot even predict the weather for next week let alone 12-13 years in the future.
sigh
I miss the days when science could view future trends with budding optimism rather than through the prism of Global Warming alarmism and other doom and gloom scenarios.
Weekly weather patterns are
Weekly weather patterns are very hard to predict. Anual averages however, are much easier to follow trends for.
We're not predicting that on 23-jun-2021 the weather in Melbourne is going to be overcast with drizzle in the afternoon. We're predicting that in 2021 the average temperatures are going to be higher than now and we're going to be experiencing different patterns of rainfall.
What you're "predicting" is
What you're "predicting" is exactly what your agenda calls for.
When global warming alarmists possess and write the computer models, you can be damn sure that what the computer spits out will match what you tell it to.
Climate versus Weather: there's a big difference
Climate is the trend overall, weather is what happens from day to day. Scientists can make climate forecasts with relative accuracy if they have a really good computer to work with, capable of parallel processing, very high speed, etc.
predictions
Do these guys all have a magic 8-ball? Most of it sounds like the flying car predictions from the 60's. The rest seems to be more of the same gorewinian life ending destruction scenarios that are reminiscient of the people in 1930 screaming that the world is "undoubtably going to run out of oil resources before 1950". Typical scientific muckraking that serves only one purpose and that is to get more funding for further study. The pseudo-scientists have really figured out that disaster movies sell.
First stage of acceptance is denial
First stage of acceptance is denial
"Good morning"
That we where "a bit" less technologically advanced in 30's than we are now, we where, meaning we had "a bit" less pollution and global worming, so I think that founding, scientific studying should be supported...
Reason why I think it's worrying is because our climate/planet temperature is changing, and we are the reason why. Should we worrie or just "go with the flow"? - if theres less waterfalls, it means theres less trees, and oxygen that we NEED to survive comes from trees, as simple as that!!!
There is not a mention of
There is not a mention of the globally collapsing food chain in this hypothesis ?
Or the global financial / economic disaster that will occur due to the massive climatic changes.
When you factor in the above I doubt very much that 90% of the population will survive the next 10 to 20 years of cataclysmic change.
Gorebasm
You sound like Owl Gore when you predict 90% of us will be gone in 10 to 20 years. What a joke. Owl Gore is a has been political hack that failed out of divinity school. His scientific credentials are non existent. In today's liberal society, if you don't spout the Global Warming mantra, you don't get grants.
Don't buy this stuff. They tried to close the U S Patent Office over 100 years ago claiming that all the useful inventions had already been made. I guess the computer chip wasn't any more predictable than the weather next week or 20 years from now. The Earth has been going through the same cycles for millennia. Get a life or just enjoy the one you have.