COSMOS magazine


Share |


Feature - online

‘X-woman’ challenges out of Africa theory

25 March 2010

Agence France-Presse


DNA from a previously unknown hominid found in Siberia, some 40,000 years old, could rewrite the textbooks - and represent a new branch on the human family tree.


Single page print view

Altai Mountains

The Altai Mountains, Siberia, where a new species closely related to humans has been found.

Credit: Nature Publishing Group

DNA from a female of previously unknown hominid – dubbed the X-woman – lived in southern Siberia some 40,000 years ago and could be a new branch on the human family tree, a finding that would rewrite Homo's exodus from Africa.

In a technical feat, scientists sequenced DNA from the bone fragment of a pinkie finger, possibly from a small female child, found in a cave in the Altai Mountains.

The bone found in Denisova Cave was extricated in 2008 from a soil layer carbon-dated to between 30,000 to 48,000 years ago.

Teased from a cellular component called mitochondria, the genome was compared to the code of our extinct cousins the Neanderthals, Homo sapiens, the bonobo and chimpanzee.

The Siberian hominid, the investigation found, had some 400 genetic differences, which makes it a candidate for being a distinct species of Homo, as the genus for humans and closely related primates is known.

It, us and the Neanderthals all shared a common ancestor who lived around a million years ago, say the investigators.

"It's absolutely amazing... It's some new creature that's not been on our radar screen so far," co-researcher Svante Pääbo told reporters.

The study, published in the weekly journal Nature, is led by Johannes Krause of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Members of the team previously sequenced most of the genome of the Neanderthal.

If their findings are confirmed, much of the early tale of human settlement will have to be revamped.

A common narrative is this: members of the genus Homo arose in east Africa. The first hominid to venture beyond this cradle was Homo erectus, around 1.9 million years ago.

That exodus was followed much later by two other known waves. The first involved either Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis hominids, between 300,000 and 500,000 years ago, who were the forerunners of the Neanderthals, our cousins.

The second were Homo sapiens, as anatomically modern man is known, who left Africa perhaps 50,000 years ago. If a "molecular clock" calculation of DNA change is right, the Denisova hominid lineage came from Africa, says the study.

Follow COSMOSmagazine on TwitterJoin COSMOSmagazine on Facebook

Readers' comments

X woman

The article mentions that homo sapians moved out of Africa 50,000 years ago. I was under the assumtion that the Aboriginals of Australia had been in Australia for that lenght of time, could some one explain?

Australia

Maybe the Australian Aborogines can link back to either Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis hominids. This might tally up with some of their ancient stories. Or they may be the Neanderthals that survived if homo sapiens never got to Australia first.

Has anyone checked the DNA?

Quick! To the lab!

Quick! To the lab!

already done

apparently they are from the same out of africa walk as european's - we went north-west and they travelled south-east...I like it! Everyone seems to forget how old Europeans are too....

If you're interested in the

If you're interested in the migration of Homo sapiens you might like to check-out the BBC series 'The Incredible Human Journey'. More details on Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredible_Human_Journey